How is it with soya?
Zobrazit další navigaci
Celý web BIOTRIN
Předchozí News in July 2012 News in June 2012 News in May 2012 News in April 2012 News in March 2012 News in February 2012 News in January 2012 News in December 2011 News in November 2011 News in October 2011 News in September 2011 News in July 2011 News in June 2011 News in May 2011 News in April 2011 News in March 2011 News in February 2011 News in January 2011 News in December 2010 News in November 2010 News in October 2010 News in September 2010 News in August 2010 News in July 2010 News in June 2010 News in May 2010 News in April 2010 News in March 2010 News in February 2010 News in January 2010 News in December 2009 News in November 2009 News in October 2009 News in September 2009 News in August 2009 News in July 2009 News in June 2009 News in May 2009 News in April 2009 News in March 2009 News in February 2009 News in January 2009 News in December 2008 News in November 2008 News in October 2008 News in September 2008 News in August 2008 News in July 2008 News in June 2008 News in May 2008 News in April 2008 News in March 2008 News in February 2008 News in January 2008 News in December 2007 News in November 2007 News in October 2007 News in September 2007 News in August 2007 News in June 2007 News in May 2007 News in April 2007 News in March 2007 News in February 2007 News in January 2007 News in December 2006 News in November 2006 News in October 2006 News in September 2006 News in August 2006 News in July 2006 News in June 2006 News in May 2006 News in April 2006 News in March 2006 News in February 2006 News in January 2006 News in December 2005 News in November 2005 News in October 2005 News in September 2005 News in August 2005 News in July 2005 News in May 2005 News in April 2005 News in March 2005 News in February 2005 News in January 2005 Global Status of commercialized BIOTECH/GM Crops: 2004 News in December 2004 News in November 2004 News in October 2004 News in September 2004 News in August 2004 Press Release Moratorium to court Project "Gene Therapy" GM food passed as safe Europe accept human cloning Two news story on Moore paper dragon burned Honeybees bring affairs in biotechnology Classical breeding PRODI EXTENDS ETHICS GROUP'S REMIT EU support for biotech Swiss conference How is it with soya? We need to talk Rice with a vitamin and without patents What is new

How is it with soya?

Soya gets in a focus of attention for two reasons: it is the most common "genetic contamination" in food to a great joy of "activists" and some journalists who can document their vigilance as "protectors" of consumers. Then, soya prepared an embarrassing dilemma to the Greens in Europe: what they should decide for - bone meal or modified soya. Both are bad for their popularity.

That is why let us briefly remember several facts without comments:

Biology

Soya (Glycine max) originated in China, where it was mentioned already 4500 ago. In Southeast China, it was domesticated probably in 11th century BC. It was established in West Europe in the 18th century AD.

Soya spreads only from seeds. Maturing of seeds depends on a length of day; and because it is a short-day plant, it is improbable that freely growing soya could mature in the conditions in CR. Seeds do not have a dormant period, therefore when they mature they start to germinate already in autumn. Sprouted plants do not survive frost. A risk of uncontrollable spreading in the Central European conditions is practically zero. Soya has a little competitive capacity; therefore a risk of oppressing the native flora is negligible.

Genus Glycine is the only from the family of fabaceous, which has a diploid number of chromosomes 40 or 80. Soya can crossbreed (2n = 40) only with other species of the genus, for example with G. soja or G. gracilis, which grow in Northeast China, Thai-wan, Japan and Korea. Cultural soya is usually self-pollinating, only in 0.03 to 3.62 % blossoms are cross-pollinating by pollen transported mainly by bees was found. A 10 m wide isolation proved in tests to be sufficient to prevent crossbreeding. In European flora, there is no relative plant that could crossbreed with soya.

As food

In USA, it was grown since 1765, originally as feed and silage. After it was successfully used as an oil-plant in 1900 till 1910, an interest in it was rising in the USA, but it was still mainly grown as feed. A basic bred cultivar was introduced in 1940, and since then an intensive cultivation goes on and soybeans get in food ever more broadly.

As a part of food, soya is appreciated for balanced contents of amino acids, and also as a stock for oil production. Nevertheless it contains also many antinutrients. Some are eliminated by heat, some are not. An inhibitor of trypsine and lectin agglutinating red blood cells, belongs to the former ones. Phytoestrogenes as genistein, daidzein and coumesterol belong to the latter ones. Soybeans also contain sugars stachyose and raffinose, which may cause intestinal problems to sensitive persons. A phytate binds calcium and magnesium in food, and may cause a lack of their bioavailable from. The most important is a presence of allergens: in soya there were found several proteins, which react with antibodies IgE in persons sensitive to soya. In USA, they identified this way 9 different proteins, in Japan it was even 15 proteins.

Growing and import

Crops in a typical production area in USA:Max 50 bu/acre = 3,36 t/ha
Medium 40 bu/acre = 2,7 t/ha

GROWING OF TRANSGENIC ROUNDUP READY SOYA

Year19961997199819992000
Area GM mil. ha1,711,027,839,944,2
Area soya mil. ha0,55,014,821,625,8
Crops mil. t1,3513,54058,370

Since 1996: 183 mil. t genetically modified soya were harvested.

A balance of the international trade with soya (beans, products) in EU (thousands t)

Year1995/961996/971997/981998/99
Production of EU9079781 5781 843
Import15 21214 31314 18913 948
Export25285826
Available16 09415 26315 70915 765
Self-sufficiency %661012
Self-sufficiency - flour %3466
Self-sufficiency - oil %791518

World market from perspective of substitution of bone flours

Among pulses, peas and beans could provide a source of proteins. Because their protein lacks some necessary amino acids, they should be prepared by fermentation and supplemented. For such a solution, peas and beans would need to be grown on 2 million ha only in Germany, which is 12 times bigger area than the present one and one sixth of all the arable land. A little amount of feed peas could be gotten from Canada (about a million t), but anyway peas and beans are not a realistic solution.

Rape has lower content of protein, which is of lower quality. It also provides less (60%) feeding flour than soya (80%). To substitute bone flour, Europe would have to grow 6 million tons of rape extra. Imported and grown rape would have to be processed into oil, which would greatly increase the price of feed and a possible surplus production of oil.

Soya is, in the necessary amount, available on world markets. Soya flour contains 44-48% protein, which is only a bit less than bone flour (50-55%). Its growing in Europe has a little perspective for climatic reasons. Overall year production of soya is about 150 million tons. One third is genetically modified. This share is in USA 54%, in Argentina 80-90%, and in Brazil it is 15-20% despite the fact it was officially forbidden to use modified seeds in Brazil, such seeds are smuggled from Argentina and Paraguay.

EU imports 14 million tons of soya every year from USA, Brazil and Argentina, which are the main world producers. About 3 million tons out of that is processed into oil, and the rest is used as a part of feeds and food. Further 14 million tons is imported directly as a soya flour for feeds. Total import represents about 1,1 billion USD.

Legislative situation in EU

Variety of soya RR 40-3-2 was assessed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery and Food in Great Britain. An Advisory board for New Food and Processes (ABNFP) finalises its assessment of 6 January, 1995 this way: "There are no reasons from viewpoint of food safety, why this product should not be used as food." "Genetically modified soya and products made of it are comparable with non-modified soya and equally safe for consumption by man."

Variety of soya RR 40-3-2 was permitted by an EC Directive 96/281/EC of 3 April, 1996, where an article 2 says: "The approval includes all the progeny obtained by cross-breeding of this line with any traditional line of soy." And further, an article 3: "This approval includes the following manipulation: manipulation in environment during import, before and during storage, before and during processing into non-living products."

According to the present reports, soya 40-3-2 import permit is expected in Poland in the beginning of January.

Genetical modification of a variety permitted in EU

An insert implemented into variety 40-3-2 includes:

bullet610 bp - P-E35S promotor from virus of cauliflower mosaic. 35S promotor is a part of mosaic of cauliflower (CaMV). This virus attacks plants belonging to the family Brassicaceae. It is cauliflower, cabbage, borecole, kohlrabi, broccoli and other forms of the genus Brassica. In nature, feeds and human food this promotor is naturally present.
bullet230 bp - Sequence from Petunia hybrida coding a peptide of transportation into chloroplast.
bullet260 bp - NOS 3' terminal sequence, that is non-translated area coding nopalin synthetase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
bullet1360 bp - Sequence coding an enzyme 5-enolpyrovylshikimate-3-phosphate synthetase (EPSPS) from bacterium CP4 identified as Agrobacterium sp.

Thence it follows that it concerns sequences, which occur normally in nature. There is no risk of them being spread by any horizontal transmission. A man normally meets Agrobacterium in food and in dust, one breathes. Soya does not contain any gene coding an antibiotics resistance.

Testing of new proteins

New proteins create at maximum 0,1% total proteins of soybeans. A digestibility test proved their half-life to be about 15 to 20 minutes. They do not contain sugar element and do not react with IgE of persons allergic to soya. Their structure is not homologous to any known allergen.

They were tested in feed tests with mice, sewer rats, quails, fish and cows. No documented difference from control non-modified soya was detected.

horizontal rule

 
Reminder to content type on to