News in November 2006
Zobrazit další navigaci
Celý web BIOTRIN
Předchozí News in July 2012 News in June 2012 News in May 2012 News in April 2012 News in March 2012 News in February 2012 News in January 2012 News in December 2011 News in November 2011 News in October 2011 News in September 2011 News in July 2011 News in June 2011 News in May 2011 News in April 2011 News in March 2011 News in February 2011 News in January 2011 News in December 2010 News in November 2010 News in October 2010 News in September 2010 News in August 2010 News in July 2010 News in June 2010 News in May 2010 News in April 2010 News in March 2010 News in February 2010 News in January 2010 News in December 2009 News in November 2009 News in October 2009 News in September 2009 News in August 2009 News in July 2009 News in June 2009 News in May 2009 News in April 2009 News in March 2009 News in February 2009 News in January 2009 News in December 2008 News in November 2008 News in October 2008 News in September 2008 News in August 2008 News in July 2008 News in June 2008 News in May 2008 News in April 2008 News in March 2008 News in February 2008 News in January 2008 News in December 2007 News in November 2007 News in October 2007 News in September 2007 News in August 2007 News in June 2007 News in May 2007 News in April 2007 News in March 2007 News in February 2007 News in January 2007 News in December 2006 News in November 2006 News in October 2006 News in September 2006 News in August 2006 News in July 2006 News in June 2006 News in May 2006 News in April 2006 News in March 2006 News in February 2006 News in January 2006 News in December 2005 News in November 2005 News in October 2005 News in September 2005 News in August 2005 News in July 2005 News in May 2005 News in April 2005 News in March 2005 News in February 2005 News in January 2005 Global Status of commercialized BIOTECH/GM Crops: 2004 News in December 2004 News in November 2004 News in October 2004 News in September 2004 News in August 2004 Press Release Moratorium to court Project "Gene Therapy" GM food passed as safe Europe accept human cloning Two news story on Moore paper dragon burned Honeybees bring affairs in biotechnology Classical breeding PRODI EXTENDS ETHICS GROUP'S REMIT EU support for biotech Swiss conference How is it with soya? We need to talk Rice with a vitamin and without patents What is new

Books, Articles

Ecological Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops - Experiences from Ten Years of Experimental Field Research and Commercial Cultivation.
Sanvido, O., Stark, M., Romeis, J., Bigler, F. Swiss Expert Commitee for Biosafety. 2006. October: 109 pages.

The global area planted with genetically modified (GM) crops has consistently increased each year since GM crops were first commercially cultivated in 1996 reaching 90 million hectares in 2005. GM crops are currently grown by 8.5 million farmers in 21 countries, where 90% of the farmers using the GM technology live in developing countries.

Five countries (USA, Argentina, Brazil, Canada and China) are growing nearly 95% of the total area of these crops and there are four main GM crops that are grown worldwide. Soybean is the principal GM crop occupying most of the global area, followed by maize, cotton and oilseed rape. Herbicide tolerance is the dominant trait that is deployed in all four crops, while maize and cotton are the only two insect resistant GM crops commercialized. Concerns have been raised that the commercial cultivation of GM crops could result in adverse effects on the environment.

Agroscope Reckenholz Tänikon Research Station ART was commissioned by the Swiss Expert Committee for Biosafety to review the scientific knowledge on environmental impacts of GM crops deriving from ten years of worldwide experimental field research and commercial cultivation. The sources of information included peer-reviewed scientific journals, scientific books, reports from countries with extensive GM crop cultivation, as well as reports from international organizations.

For some of the questions addressed only limited information was available from commercial cultivation. Therefore most chapters of the study include to some extent scientific data deriving from large-scale experimental field research. The authors recognize that results from large-scale cultivation systems, as often characteristic in the countries growing GM crops, have to be transferred with care to small-scale agricultural systems like in Switzerland.

However, we believe that the worldwide scientific knowledge and the existing practical experiences should be taken into account for future decision making when discussing potential risks of field releases of GM crops in Switzerland.

Transgenic Plants: Facts and Stakes
André Gallais, Agn?s Ricroch, Plantes transgéniques: faits et enjeux
Paperback - In French 2006 - 34.00 ?, ISBN-10 2759200019

The public at large will find the book's discussion of all problems related to the development of transgenic plants

Scientists get free access to environment journals
A new scheme will give scientists at many developing country institutes free access to over 1,000 environmental science journals.

Agricultural Input Traits: Past, Present and Future
Castle, L., Wu, G., McElroy, D. 2006. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 17: 105-112.

For thousands of years farm practices have evolved as new innovations have become available. Farmers want more value per unit of land, clean fields, and high yields with less input. Plants with incorporated pest resistance and herbicide resistance help meet these needs through increased yield, reduced chemical use, and reduced soil impacts.

Although researchers have developed useful traits for a wide variety of plant species, only a few traits are available commercially; however, global adoption of these traits has and continues to increase rapidly. Availability of future traits will be dependent on input not only from researchers, but from governments, interest groups, processors, distributors and ultimately consumers, in addition to the farmers that drive demand for transgenic seed.

Study Shows GM OK to Environment
CropBiotech Net,

Data available so far provides no scientific evidence that the commercial cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops has caused environmental harm. This was the conclusion of a study "Ecological impacts of GM crops: Experiences from 10 years of experimental field research and commercial cultivation", commissioned by the Swiss Expert Committee for Biosafety. The study focused on insect resistance maize, herbicide tolerant soybean and soilseed rape, three of the major GM crops of significance for Swiss agriculture. Dr. Joerg Romeis of the Agroscope Reckenholz-Tanikan Research Station which conducted the study said that a number of issues related to the interpretation of scientific data on effects of GM crops on the environment were brought up. The study highlights these scientific debates and discusses the effects of GM crop cultivation on the environment considering the impacts caused by cultivation practices of modern agricultural systems. Email Dr. Romeis at for additional information and how to obtain a copy of the report.

Environmental Risks of Genetic Engineering
Clark, E.A. 2006. Euphytica. 148: 47-60.

Before release into commerce, genetically engineered organisms are first assessed for possible risks, including risks to the environment. The present paper first identifies the environmental risks recognized by regulators, and reviews the parameters considered predictive of risk. Recent field-scale studies suggest opportunities for improvement of the environmental risk assessment process. Risks unique to genetically engineered crops - if any - could pertain to the specific traits chosen for commercialization and to unintended trait expression caused by the process of transgene insertion itself. Both the standard against which to compare genetically engineered traits and the scale of exposure need to be considered when assessing environmental impact.

Evidence of environmental risk in the recognized areas of weediness on agricultural land, invasiveness of unmanaged systems, and non-target impacts from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) maize is presented. Targeted, statistically sound, rigorously conducted, multi-trophic studies analogous to the Field Scale Evaluation trials recently completed in the UK are needed to clarify the many questions which remain unanswered.

Biosafety of Genetically Modified Plants
information portal brings transparency to biosafety research

Does genetically modified maize have an impact on beneficial insects? How does genetically modified oilseed rape affect pollen-collecting bees? How can transgenic pollen and seeds be prevented from spreading in the environment? These are just some of the questions being investigated in biological safety research worldwide. Answers and research findings, which are otherwise usually made public only at scientific conferences and congresses, are accessible to the public at

The information portal was commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and over recent years has become the central information hub for everything to do with biological safety research in Germany. Now the website is also available in English. At interested laymen, journalists and politicians can find out what effect the modification of plant DNA has on the ecological interaction between plants and their environment.

The primary focus of the site is on crops - maize, oilseed rape, potatoes and cereals. Other topics include the development of more accurate tools for plant genetic engineering and concepts for post-market monitoring. A comprehensive database provides clear information about current and completed research projects, their aims and results. The research information is supplemented by background reports, interviews and insights into the day-to-day work of researchers. The site also presents major international studies on the environmental safety of GM plants.

The website accompanies the BMBF's support programme for biosafety research into genetically modified crops, which was launched in 2001. The ministry's aim is to create greater transparency and to offer the public the opportunity to form an informed opinion about the opportunities and threats of transgenic plants.

Contact: Sandra Wilcken, Team, Genius GmbH, Germany,;

'GM products will continue to be marginalized in Europe as long as industry remains silent.'
Editorial, Nature Biotechnology, October 2006 Vol. 24 (10), Page 1177. Reproduced in AgBioView with permission of the editor.

Organic baby spinach: could anything be more wholesome? According to the website of Earthbound Farm, the largest US grower of organic produce, "delicious organic salads, fruits and vegetables are grown with a concern for the things you value most-your family's health, the air you breathe, the water you drink and your children's future." Of course, "organic produce is never genetically engineered or modified" and "encourages an abundance of species living in balanced, harmonious ecosystems."

One of the species it encourages appears to be the food pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7. As Nature Biotechnology went to press E. coli O157:H7 from fresh-picked spinach had caused 150 people in 23 US states to get sick, around 75 hospitalizations, including over 20 cases hemolytic uremic syndrome, one confirmed death (a 77-year-old woman) and two deaths that were suspected of being connected with 'fresh' spinach. In mid-September, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advised consumers not to eat bagged fresh spinach and urged anyone who had and who felt ill to contact their physician.

A month earlier, the FDA and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) held a joint press conference to announce that they had been notified by Bayer CropScience that trace amounts of an herbicide-resistant genetically engineered rice, LL Rice 601, had been detected in commercial long-grain rice. Before the resultant media furor died down, Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth followed up with the news that they had found the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin gene in rice products imported into Europe from China.

Patrick Moore - Going Nuclear
Edward Weinman, Iceland Review, November 13, 2006.

The co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, left the prominent environmental organization in 1986 because it began "abandoning science and logic." Now the director of Greenspirit, Moore speaks out for the nuclear industry, the forest industry and supports genetically engineered crops. Is he still an environmentalist?

Edward Weinman: What are the most serious environmental problems facing us today?

Patrick Moore: Poverty, deforestation in the tropics, micronutrient deficiency (malnutrition), urban sprawl, population growth and air pollution.

EW: You left Greenpeace in 1986. Why leave what was perhaps the first environmental organization with clout?

PM: I left because I saw my colleagues abandoning science and logic and adopting zero-tolerance policies that made no sense. In many ways, Greenpeace is now promoting policies that are environmentally negative. Genetically modified crops reduce pesticide use; nuclear energy reduces greenhouse gas emissions; sustainable forestry produces the most abundant renewable material; aquaculture produces healthy oils and protein, and takes pressure off the wild stocks.

EW: How do we reconcile global needs to exploit natural resources for food and energy with the need to protect the environment? Are these needs incompatible?

PM: There are many ways to reconcile human needs with environmental protection. Sustainability is about continuing to satisfy civilization's need for food, energy, and materials while at the same time reducing negative environmental impact. This can be done through changes in behaviour (e.g., energy conservation) and technological change (e.g., using nuclear energy and renewable energy instead of fossil fuel).

Full interview at

Genetically Modified Foods Are Safe, Weizmann Head Says
Janice Arnold, Canadian Jewish News, 25 Cheshvan, 5767 (Nov. 16, 2006)

Ilan Chet, president of the Weizmann Institute of Science and a professor of soil microbiology, said in Montreal recently that the benefits of such foods far outweigh the "very small risk" that harmful genes might be introduced into a plant. He acknowledged that there is a "marginal risk" to wild vegetation if an introduced gene spreads beyond cultivated crops.

He was firm that genetically modified foods should be labelled as such, and he said it was a mistake not to have done so from the beginning, because that has contributed to fear about these products. Chet noted that he is environmentally conscious: much of his career has been devoted to developing the use of micro-organisms as a replacement for chemical pesticides.

Chet scolded Europeans, in particular, for being unnecessarily alarmist about genetically modified foods, a phenomenon he attributes mainly to the influence of various national Green parties and Britain's Prince Charles.

Green Activists Board Ship in Protest
The St. Petersburg Times (Russia), Nov. 14, 2006

Three activists from the international environmental organization Greenpeace on Monday chained themselves to a cargo ship carrying more than 5,000 tons of genetically modified soya en route from Amsterdam to St. Petersburg.Greenpeace has been campaigning in the past several years for a complete ban on production of GM soya.

The three activists, who got on board of "Rusich-1" on Sunday to take samples of soya - tests have already revealed the soya is GM - were detained by the police. Greenpeace's boat "Arctic Sunrise" caught up with "Rusich-1" on Sunday in the Baltic Sea, about 200 miles away from St. Petersburg.

Russian legislation does not require any products made with GM ingredients to be marked with an appropriate label. According to Greenpeace, 77 percent of the imported GM soya arrives to Russia by sea via the Amsterdam-St. Petersburg route.

Genetically Modified Grapevine Field Trail in Stellenbosch, South Africa

The grapevine biotechnology research programme of the IWBT focuses on understanding and ultimately improving disease resistance in grapevine in support of environmentallyfriendly production practices. The South African wine and grapevine industries have supported this research since 1998 for its strategic potential and prospective economic importance. The research has established the IWBT as one of the major centers internationally where grapevine transformations and biotechnology research are conducted.
Full document at

The Commission on Green Biotechnology
is a constituent of the Union of the German Academies of Sciences and Humanities (UGASH).  C Kameswara Rao, Foundation for Biotechnology Awareness and Education, Bangalore, India,,,

The InterAcademy Panel (IAP), a worldwide network of 92 Academies of Sciences, with its Secretariat in Trieste/Italy, advises citizens and politicians in their home countries on current problems of global relevance. The 'Berlin Group' are the participants of a workshop on 'Genetically modified crops in developing countries', jointly conducted by UGASH and IAP in Berlin (May 27-29, 2006).  The Berlin Group has now issued a Statement that is being circulated for adoption by various academies in Europe and elsewhere.

The Berlin Group has taken the position that 'Molecular engineering of crops has brought revolutionary advances in agriculture. In just ten years since their introduction, many GM crop varieties have been grown on about 5 per cent of all global arable cropland in 21 countries by 8.5 million farmers, 90 per cent of them being resource-poor. Some developing countries have benefited from GM crops and are now in position to affirm their need and their will to adopt GM crops'. Based on this assertion, the Berlin Group states that:

  1. Foods from GM crops are more extensively tested than any other and have been shown to be as safe as, or even sometimes safer than, foods derived from the corresponding conventional plants. Ten years of human consumption and extensive nutritional testing amply support this conclusion. Any food, GM or not, may certainly involve some risks for human health. There is presently not the least scientific and/or medical evidence that the risks possibly entailed by the former would be higher than those entailed by the latter.
  2. The environmental impact of GM crops is no greater than that of traditional crops. In some cases GM crops have diminished the negative effects of current agricultural practices.  Insect-resistant cotton requires substantially decreased applications of chemical pesticides while herbicide-tolerant crops permit no-till practices, cutting energy use and promoting healthy soils. Seed-incorporated technology is particularly suitable for small farmers in developing countries. GM crops resistant to pests and diseases reduce farmers' exposure to chemical pesticides, particularly when applied by hand sprays. The successful cultivation of GM cotton in the developing countries shows how subsistence farmers have significantly increased their income and improved the quality of their life.
  3. In both developed and some developing countries, organic farmers have already been operating in an environment subjected to influences from neighbouring activities. With proper separation safeguards, the presence of genes encoding GM traits in organic products is trivial. Nothing in GM agriculture prevents organic farmers from pursuing their normal practices.  There is no evidence-based justification in the rules of organic farming to exclude the use of GM crops.
  4. GM crops can make a major global contribution to the quantity and quality of food. In developing countries, farmers suffer major crop losses caused by insects and diseases. GM technology has already shown that such losses can be significantly reduced, leading directly to improvements in food quality and safety (e.g. insect-resistant maize has appreciably lower levels of highly carcinogenic fungal toxins).
  5. Just as each consumer ought to have the right to adopt or reject GM food, farmers should be able to decide for themselves whether to plant conventional, organic or GM crops. For such a choice, appropriate regulations including labelling of GM products must be in place, and such regulations should be proportionate and not excessive. The safety assessment procedures now enacted in developed countries for GM crops and products result in needlessly high costs and hinder the application of this valuable technology to the many crops grown in the developing world. For developing countries to have access to crop biotechnology for their own agriculture, international and non-profit organizations must help governments to formulate appropriate regulations and assist with the training of personnel to administer them.
  6. It is frequently argued that farmers growing GM crops loose their freedom when they are obliged to buy their seeds annually. However, in most developing countries farmers are accustomed to using farmer saved seeds that is in many cases allowed by law, and this could also be applied to GM cultivars.

The Berlin Statement denounces the unsupported arguments used against GM crops and calls upon governments and environmental NGOs to end unjustified campaigns against GM crops.
Such a firm and positive stance covering all contingent issues is most welcome, more particularly since it comes from Europe, often cited as vehemently anti-GM.

UK: PM Attacks 'Irrational Arguments' on GM Food
James Kirkup, The Scotsman, Nov 4, 2006

Tony Blair yesterday risked infuriating opponents of genetically modified food - who include Prince Charles - by suggesting that their arguments are not "rational." The Prime Minister was making a keynote speech on science, in which he called for Britain to discuss technological innovations in a more "scientifically literate" fashion. "Government must show leadership and courage in standing up for science and rejecting an irrational public debate around it," he said, attacking those who had "distorted" facts to oppose developments such as GM food. Mr Blair said he was encouraged by the public debate about stem-cell research: whereas the US has largely banned the practice, Britain is a world leader in the field. The Prince of Wales has frequently questioned the value and safety of GM crops, which has irritated some government figures. Asked if Mr Blair's remarks were a criticism of the prince, the Prime Minister's spokesman said only: "We believe the debate has not been as rational as it should have been."


13th European Congress on Biotechnology
Barcelona, 17-19 September 2007

In line with the European Federation of Biotechnology's mission, the 13th European Congress on Biotechnology will focus on addressing the great challenges to humanity through the crucial theme of Symbiosis, applying cutting-edge Science and Industry in support of Society. The Scientific Programme Committee chaired by Prof. Mathias Uhlen is putting together a world-class programme. See the Congress website for more details and regular updates at

OECD Forum 2007 will be held on 14th and 15th May in Paris.

It will address a range of topics under the theme of "Innovation for growth and equity: A new agenda for globalisation"

The World Congress on Industrial Biotechnology & Bioprocessing
Location: Florida, United States, Date: 21 - 24 March 2007

Conference in Alexandria met at November 15 to discuss how to boost research and development in the Arab world.

About 50 Arab and non-Arab scientists, technologists and science policymakers attended the conference. Stressing the importance of science and technology for development, they noted the importance of building scientific capacity to produce technology locally, rather than relying on imported technology.

Arab states must adopt more innovative ways of teaching science, they said.

For this they suggested introducing new information and communication technologies in schools, setting up special schools for gifted children and including the basics of science and technology in their national curricula at all educational levels.

To reform the Arab science and technology sector, the conference recommendations must be put into a broad strategic plan for science development that is adopted and financially supported by Arab governments."


Europe - EU

EU Biotech Crop Regulations and Environmental Risk: A Case of the Emperor's New Clothes?
Shane H. Morris Trends in Biotechnology, Nov. 20, 2006.
Full paper

European Union Commissioner for the Environment Stavros Dimas recently hailed 'upgraded' non-genetically modified (GM) crops as an alternative to GM crops. A comparative analysis of the environmental risks associated with such non-GM herbicide-resistant crops and GM herbicide-resistant crops is presented here. The analysis highlights serious weaknesses in the European Union (EU) regulatory framework, and the contradictory policy of the EU Commission on the precautionary principle is also shown. The continued political stance of ignoring these regulatory and policy inconsistencies is examined and found to be flawed. It is postulated that, even in the face of these flaws and coupled with recent statements from the UK drawing attention to inconsistencies in the EU regulatory framework, the EU will continue to ignore the real and present environmental risks associated with upgraded non-GM crops for bio political reasons.

Influence biosafety and biosecurity practices

An invitation to contribute to the coordination, harmonisation and exchange of biosafety and biosecurity practices within a pan-European network (BIOSAFETY-EUROPE)

BIOSAFETY-EUROPE is a Coordination Action funded through the European Commission's Sixth Framework Programme which started on April 1st 2006. The project has 19 partners from 11 European countries and an overall aim of promoting European harmonisation and the exchange of practices relating to biosafety and biosecurity management of biological containment facilities. The project will assess the cost-effectiveness of methods and practices used, develop a programme for training and seminars and result in recommendations that may be used for future policy making within the EU.

The project aims to ask three broad questions:

bulletWho is working within BSL3 and 4 facilities in Europe and under which regulatory and operational frameworks?
bulletHow are facilities implementing biosecurity and biosafety controls and are they effective?
bulletCan biosecurity and biosafety be improved and how can this be harmonized at the European level.

EFB members wishing to contribute can contact the project Coordinator Kathrin Summermatter ( or visit the project web site (available end of October: The Task Group on Safety in Biotechnology of the EFB fully supports this initiative as way to facilitate harmonization and to influence regulatory developments.

Patrick Rüdelsheim, Chairman EFB Task Group Safety in Biotechnology

Prion hypothesis challenged by new Sheep study

Despite the fact that the Nobel Prize was awarded for the prion hypothesis, there remains the possibility that the infectious agent behind diseases such as mad cow, scrapie and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease might not necessarily be rogue prion protein. The findings of the SC GUT project, funded for five years via the European Commission’s Fifth Framework Programme, show that there is a need to remain diligent and open minded when investigating the causes of this group of diseases.

FP7 - 7th Framework Programme

bulletUnderstanding the Seventh Framework Programme-
bulletFP7 Fact Sheets
bullet- FP7 slide presentation
- FP7 Press Briefing
bulletAdvisory Groups for FP7
- New advisory groups listed

SCAR net: Web site on Agricultural research

bulletStanding Committee on Agricultural Research: Luxembourg

Renewable energy, biomass: Refining Europe’s ideas on bio-refineries

Both for economic and environmental reasons, Europe needs to find alternatives to its current dependence on fossil fuels. An EU conference in Helsinki (FI) explored one of the alternatives: bio-refineries.

Scientists have another look at peer review system

Has the traditional procedure of scientific peer review reached the level of its own incompetence? That was the focus of a recent conference in Prague organised by the European Science Foundation (ESF), the Czech Science Foundation (GACR), and the European Heads of Research Councils (EuroHORCs).


French Activist Farmer Bove Held in Custody
Reuters, Nov. 4, 2006

Bordeaux - Police detained radical farmer Jose Bove, a possible candidate for France's 2007 presidential election, on Saturday after a demonstration against genetically modified food (GMO) on private property.

Bove and some 50 other farmers went to the police to file a complaint of attempted murder against a corn producer. The owner, who was also held, had fired a gun in the air to disperse the demonstrators, police said. Between 100 and 150 protesters went to the farm in the southern Gironde region and poured water over what they said was genetically modified corn stocked in a silo in the town of Lugos. When the owner arrived, he fired his gun and ran his car into four vehicles before the demonstrators overpowered him. Bove, a prominent protester against globalisation and fast food, said in June he would run for president next year, hoping to rally voters on the far left. In 2003 he spent six weeks in jail for smashing up a McDonald's restaurant and was sentenced to four months in prison last year for destroying a field of genetically modified corn in southern France.


The New York Academy of Sciences Announces Launch of Scientists Without Borders
Genetic Engineering News, Nov. 17 2006

The New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS) today announced the launch of Scientists Without Borders (SM), a groundbreaking project that will help link scientists worldwide to address health and other pressing problems in the developing world. The program, created in collaboration with the United Nations Millennium Project and guided by the Millennium Development Goals, will create a Web portal designed as a global dissemination and reference point for scientific knowledge. The portal will help to align efforts of the many public and private organizations already working toward the Millennium Goals, which are to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality and empower women; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; and develop a global partnership for development.

Genetically Engineered Rice Wins USDA Approval Grain,
Tainted U.S. Supply This Summer
Christopher Lee, Washington Post, Nov. 25, 2006

The Department of Agriculture declared safe for human consumption yesterday an experimental variety of genetically engineered rice found to have contaminated the U.S. rice supply this summer. The move by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to deregulate the special long-grain rice, LL601, was seen as a legal boon to its creator, Bayer CropScience of Research Triangle Park, N.C. The company applied for approval shortly after the widespread contamination was disclosed in August and now faces a class-action lawsuit filed by hundreds of farmers in Arkansas and Missouri.

The experimental rice, designed to resist Bayer's Liberty weed killer, escaped from Bayer's test plots after the company dropped the project in 2001. The resulting contamination, once it became public, prompted countries around the world to block rice imports from the United States, sending rice futures plummeting and farmers into fits. In approving the rice, the USDA allowed Bayer to take a regulatory shortcut and skip many of the usual safety tests by declaring that the new variety is similar to ones already approved, in this case two varieties of biotech rice that Bayer never commercialized because farmers did not want them in their fields. The department gave its preliminary approval Sept. 8.  "The protein in the company's herbicide-tolerant rice varieties . . . is well known to regulators, who have affirmed the rice poses no human health or environmental concern," said Greg Coffey, a Bayer spokesman.

Most critics agree that the new rice is safe to eat. The bacterial gene that is in LL601 is also in several approved varieties of engineered corn, canola and cotton. Experts say the key gene in the new rice is sure to move via pollen into red rice, a weedy relative of white rice and the No. 1 plant pest for rice farmers in the South.

Brazil bans GMOs in indigenous territories

Brazil has banned transgenic crops from indigenous territories but reduced the buffer zone separating them from conservation areas. [Spanish Full Text]

India gives West Africa US$250m to develop biofuels

The Indian government has provided US$250 million to fund biofuel production in 15 West African countries.

China signs science deals with Egypt and Algeria

China has signed deals with Egypt and Algeria to boost scientific cooperation, just days after the China-Africa summit concluded.

African science to benefit from China trade deal

Agricultural science in Africa will be boosted by a trade and aid deal that African countries agreed with China at a summit meeting this weekend.

Experts Vow to Push Biotech In Agriculture and Save Fish
Jonathan L. Mayuga, BusinessMirror (Philippines), Nov. 14, 2006

Experts in the field of biotechnology late last week ended a week long workshop on biotechnology with the resolve to adopt biotechnological advances in agriculture and expand the propagation of transgenic plants and trees and solve problems related to food security, treatment of incurable diseases and global reforestation.
Their findings become more crucial as the experts in Canada warned about overfishing, which could deplete the seafood supply by 2048, or a mere two generations away. Boris Worn of Dalhousie University in Canada said in the November 3 issue of the journal Science that in 2003, the catch of 29 percent of fished species had collapsed by 90 percent, indicating that these species are not reproducing as quickly as humanity consumes them. The impact of collapsing species would be terrible, Worn warned, since it would lead to an unraveling of the entire global ecosystem.

Korea's Kim Donghern, the lead shepherd of the event, the 10th Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Agricultural Technical Cooperation Working Group-Research, Development and Extension of Agricultural Biotechnology, cited the need to harness the potentials of biotechnology, not only for food, but for the environment, as well.

Korea is now stepping up the development of transgenic trees and expressed willingness to share information and technology to come up with fast-growing trees that can replenish the world's already bald forest with trees.

Biotechnology experts are now rushing to respond to some of these scientific findings and they are feverishly working on developing transgenic fish that reproduce quicker and in bigger volumes. A. R. Kapuscinski discussed the production of transgenic fish, which was originally developed, only for the aquarium market, with GloFish as the first transgenic fish that glows due to the action of a fluorescent protein that affects the skeletal muscle of the fish.

Now, the trend is for the development of fish species that grow quickly and provide abundant food for humans. Many types of shellfish are also being developed, even as Kapuscinski says environmental biosafety concerns have cropped up over the control of these fish species.

IRRI Official Cites Golden Rice Program
Marvyn N. Benaning, Manila Bulletin, Nov. 12, 2006

Los Ba?os, Laguna - The country has a better chance of reducing the Vitamin A deficiency of more than a third of its young if it pursues the expansion of hectarage devoted to the cultivation of the RC82 rice variety. This was the assessment made by Dr. Gerard Barry, chief of the Intellectual Property Management (IPM) unit of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) here, during the workshop of biotechnology experts from the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) at the Diamond Hotel in Manila from Nov. 5-12. Barry also wants all member-nations of the APEC to support the Golden Rice Program to battle the prevalent Vitamin A and other micronutrient deficiencies in Third World Countries.

The IRRI official told participants at the 10th APEC Agricultural Technical Core Working Group (ATCWG) Research, Development, Extension of Agricultural Biotechnology workshop that it is not only logical but absolutely necessary to enhance the nutritional value of rice if developing countries want to defeat the scourge on health posed by vitamin deficiency, especially among children.

Aside from the Philippines, South Korea and China have joined the campaign for biofortification of rice as other companies like HarvestPlus have been breeding crops that are rich in iron, zinc, and pro-vitamin A. Among these crops are wheat, maize, sweet potato, beans, and cassava.

Barry foresees the further development of these rice strains to combat nutritional problems in many countries. Fortified rice is better than distributing supplements that eventually do not reach the target public, he admitted.

Costa Ricans Willing to Try GM Banana
CropBiotech Net,

Costa Rica is the second largest exporter of banana worldwide. Results of an exploratory study of the consumption and adoption of transgenic bananas in the country indicated that farmers are willing to adopt transgenic varieties because of potential savings in pest management costs. "This situation could be similar in other developing countries. any developments that could reduce management costs would be welcome by producers", wrote Francisco Aguilar and Bert Kohlmann in their paper published by the International Journal of Consumer Studies. The research has determined that a majority of Costa Rican consumers are also willing to buy and consume transgenic bananas. Those consumers that are young, have a small household, and higher levels of education and income, were found to be more likely to try the product. Aguilar and Kohlmann recommend that consumers be informed about transgenic products, their benefits, and associated risks. Only 35% of the consumers in their research were aware of the technology. The complete paper is at

Tomatoes Against Drought
Lukas Herwig, Checkbiotech, Nov. 14, 2006

Recently, a research team under the lead of Dr. Roberto Gaxiola, from the University of Connecticut managed to engineer a drought resistant crop plant by enabling the plants to produce more of a specific enzyme called H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase). To achieve this, the research team first tested if genetically modifying plants so that they produced an increased amount of a specific enzyme, the H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) AVP1, would result in salt and water stress tolerant Arabidopsis plants. Arabidopsis is commonly used as model organisms. They found that the increased production of enzyme rendered the Arabidopsis plants more resistant to drought.

Thus, encouraged by these positive results they went one step further by testing whether AVP1 could be used to engineer a drought-resistant crop plant. By using a special biological technique they transferred the AVP-1 gene to tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, a cultivar tomato). The results were astonishing: an increased root system and an enhanced ability to recover from water deficit stress. Due to a more robust root system, the transgenic tomatoes were able to increase their water uptake during drought periods.

Considering the results of this study, the team concluded that the overexpression of the AVP-1 gene could provide a general strategy to gain drought-resistant crop plants. When Checkbiotech asked Dr. Gaxiola whether his team is testing other plants as well, or is intending to study the effect in other plants, he answered, "Yes, we are currently working with rice and poplar trees and plan to work with legumes."

Engineering Edible Cottonseed

Researchers have genetically engineered toxin-free cottonseeds, potentially unlocking a large source of nutrition.
PNAS News Nov. 20, 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)- Article #05389: "Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol" by Ganesan Sunilkumar, LeAnne M. Campbell, Lorraine Puckhaber, Robert D. Stipanovic, and Keerti S. Rathore

Cotton fibre continues to be a globally vital textile crop. The leftover cottonseeds are a high source of protein, but the presence of the toxic chemical gossypol makes them unfit for human consumption.

To remove gossypol from cottonseeds, Keerti Rathore and colleagues used RNA interference to disrupt a key gene for synthesizing gossypol in developing seeds. The technique produced mature seeds with gossypol levels well below the safe level for human consumption. Gossypol levels remained high in other parts of the cotton plant, however, allowing the seeds to maintain their natural, chemical defences.

Considering that the 44 million metric tons of cottonseed produced annually could nutritionally support 500 million people, gossypol-free cotton may provide a boon for global malnutrition, the researchers say. Also, besides the potential of edible cottonseed, RNA interference could possibly be applied to other crops with toxic components, such as fava beans, to increase their utilization.

Organic Mystery: Bt Pesticide May Not Really be an Insect Killer
David Biello, Scientific American, Dec 2006,

According to the accepted model, Bt toxin punches holes in an insect's gut. These pores either allow the bacterium to infect the insect's blood, the so-called hemolymph, or cause the insect to starve.

Nichole Broderick the University of Wisconsin-Madison graduate student fed the pesticide to gypsy moth caterpillars that had been cleared with antibiotics of other gut bacteria, she expected it to become even more lethal. "Initially I was testing the hypothesis that the gut bacteria were actually protecting the moth from Bt," she recalls. "I found that once they did not have a gut community [of bacteria], I could no longer kill them with Bt."

Studies on Bt in the past decades have focused on the first steps of Bt's action. "Nobody has really focused on what happens after the toxin makes the holes and the cells die," comments entomologist Juan Jurat-Fuentes of the University of Tennessee-Knoxville. "Do the insects recover, or are the other bacteria taking over?" The Wisconsin researchers found, by reintroducing the gut bacteria one by one, that the Enterobacter species NAB3 reinstated Bt's deadliest impact, and subsequent tests showed that this bacterium thrived in the hemolymph, whereas B. thuringiensis quickly died. Further, Escherichia coli engineered to produce the Bt crystal proved equally effective in killing larvae, although not when the bacterium host was dead but still carrying the toxin.

The results may explain the variable effectiveness often seen in Bt; for example, gypsy moths feeding on willow are resistant to the toxin, Raffa notes. Some had argued that the tannins in the willow might be binding to the Bt protein and allowing it to be eliminated, but now Raffa wonders if other compounds in the tree might be affecting Enterobacter, which might be the true killer. "Where it gets to be important is in revisiting our interpretation of some of those earlier findings," he says. It also might help explain the mystery of corn pest Spodoptera frugiperda, more commonly known as the fall armyworm, which develops holes in its gut when exposed to Bt but fails to die. "People had a hard time explaining how this toxin binds and makes pores, but it's not killing the insects," Jurat-Fuentes says.

B. thuringiensis is also rather mysterious: it remains unclear why the bacterium expends so much energy producing the crystals, as it delivers no clear benefit to the microbe. And after roughly 10 years of widespread use in transgenic crops--globally, at least 500,000 square miles of farmland bear plants that produce their own Bt toxin--almost none of the targeted insects have shown signs of immunity, unlike other pesticides. "There is still only one insect, the diamondback moth, that has evolved resistance," observes entomologist Bruce Tabashnik of the University of Arizona.

Although this study suggests that Bt works in conjunction with gut bacteria, perhaps to produce septicemia, the exact killing mechanism remains unknown. Resolving it could lead to ways that prevent Bt resistance or improve the effectiveness of the toxin. At least the research gives new appreciation of the crop pests. "More and more we're seeing that you can't just think of the insect as a single species," Tabashnik remarks. "You have to look at the community of the symbionts it harbors and how that affects how it interacts with its environment."

Rapid Trait Development System (RTDS)

Cibus, a San Diego company, which has been funded quietly for several years by a group of biotechnology investors in the US, believes there is huge potential in its non-transgenic technology for introducing "traits" such as herbicide resistance into plants. Cibus named after the Latin word for food will collaborate with the US National Grain Sorghum Producers Foundation to develop new traits for the cereal and also expects to hit the herbicide-resistant seed market with canola (oilseed rape) next year and rice in 2008.

The RTDS technology uses the plant's own genetic machinery to change its DNA, through a site-directed mutagenesis. This is standard practice for bacteria but Cibus is the first company to develop a fast and reliable way of applying it to plants.  "Essentially they are directing and greatly speeding up natural selection," says Guy Cardineau, a professor at Arizona State University.  He is one of several independent plant scientists who have evaluated RTDS and are enthusiastic about its potential.

Wheat gene discovery could fight malnutrition

New research revealing how to boost the nutrient content of wheat could help combat malnutrition in developing countries, say researchers.

Wheat Gene May Boost Foods' Nutrient Content
University of California, Davis
Nov. 23, 2006

Researchers at the University of California, Davis; the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and the University of Haifa in Israel have cloned a gene from wild wheat that increases the protein, zinc and iron content in the grain, potentially offering a solution to nutritional deficiencies affecting hundreds of millions of children around the world.

Results from the study will be reported in the Nov. 24 issue of the journal Science. "Wheat is one of the world's major crops, providing approximately one-fifth of all calories consumed by humans, therefore, even small increases in wheat's nutritional value may help decrease deficiencies in protein and key micronutrients," said Professor Jorge Dubcovsky, a wheat breeder and leader of this research group. He noted that the World Health Organization estimates that more than 2 billion people are deficient in zinc and iron, and more than 160 million children under the age of five lack an adequate protein supply.

The cloned gene, designated GPC-B1 for its effect on Grain Protein Content, accelerates grain maturity and increases grain protein and micronutrient content by 10 to 15 percent in the wheat varieties studied so far. To prove that all these effects were produced by this gene, the researchers created genetically modified wheat lines with reduced levels of the GPC gene by a technique called RNA interference. These lines were developed by research geneticist Ann Blechl of USDA's Agricultural Research Service in Albany, Calif.

Dubcovsky leads a consortium of 20 public wheat-breeding programs known as the Wheat Coordinated Agricultural Project, which is rapidly introducing GPC-B1 and other valuable genes into U.S. wheat varieties using a rapid-breeding technique called Marker Assisted Selection. The resulting varieties are not genetically modified organisms, which will likely speed their commercial adoption. More information about the Wheat Coordinated Agricultural Project is available online at [ ]

Reminder to content type on to